The tokenized real-world asset market is quoted as $20 billion, $36 billion, or $338 billion depending on the source—and all three numbers are correct. The confusion stems from methodological differences: "distributed" RWA counts only freely transferable tokens, "total" RWA includes platform-locked assets, and adding stablecoins captures the full on-chain ecosystem. Meanwhile, institutional private chains like Broadridge DLR process $9 trillion monthly—volume invisible to most public dashboards.
The $20 Billion Question
Last month, a portfolio manager at a major pension fund asked me a simple question: "How big is the RWA market?" I gave him three numbers. He thought I was being evasive. I wasn't. The tokenized real-world asset market is simultaneously $20 billion, $36 billion, and $338 billion—and understanding why is the difference between sounding informed and sounding confused in your next board meeting.
When BlackRock's Larry Fink declares tokenization "the next generation for markets," analysts scramble to size the opportunity. But they're measuring different things. Here's what's actually happening:
Definition 1: Distributed RWA (~$20 Billion)
Tokenized assets that can move freely between wallets on public blockchains. Think of it as the liquid, tradeable market. In 2025, rwa.xyz—the industry's standard data source—changed its methodology to distinguish between tokens you can actually transfer and tokens locked to specific platforms.
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| Current Value | ~$20B |
| Includes | BUIDL, Ondo USDY, Centrifuge pools, Paxos Gold |
| Excludes | Platform-locked tokens, permissioned assets, stablecoins |
| Transferable? | Yes—wallet to wallet |
When to use this number: Conservative estimates, institutional presentations, citing "liquid" tokenized assets.
Definition 2: Total RWA (~$36 Billion)
Distributed plus Represented (platform-locked) assets combined. Everything tokenized, whether you can move it or not.
| Asset Class | Value | % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Private Credit | ~$18.9B | 53% |
| Tokenized Treasuries | ~$9B | 25% |
| Commodities (Gold) | ~$3.5B | 10% |
| Institutional Alternatives | ~$2.95B | 8% |
| Real Estate & Other | ~$1.6B | 4% |
| TOTAL | ~$36B | 100% |
When to use this number: Comprehensive market sizing, comparing to industry reports, general "RWA market" discussions.
Definition 3: Stablecoins (~$302 Billion)
The elephant everyone ignores. Technically, USDT and USDC are real-world assets—they're backed by U.S. Treasuries and cash. But the industry tracks them separately because they serve as infrastructure rather than investment vehicles.
Full ecosystem calculation: Total RWA ($36B) + Stablecoins ($302B) = ~$338B in real-world value on public blockchains.
When to include stablecoins: Discussing total real-world value on-chain, arguing that tokenization is already mainstream (it is—for dollars).
The "real" tokenization market is far larger than any public dashboard suggests. Broadridge DLR alone processes $356 billion daily—dwarfing the entire public chain market.
Definition 4: Private Chains ($9T+ Monthly)
Here's what most articles miss entirely. While everyone debates whether the public RWA market is $20B or $36B, institutional private chains process orders of magnitude more—and none of it shows up in rwa.xyz.
| Platform | Operator | Volume |
|---|---|---|
| Broadridge DLR | Broadridge | $9T/month |
| Onyx/Kinexys | JPMorgan | $700B+ processed |
| GS DAP | Goldman Sachs | €100M+ bonds |
When to cite private chain data: Demonstrating institutional adoption is real, arguing that public metrics understate the market, differentiating your analysis from surface-level coverage.
The Projection Problem: McKinsey vs. BCG
The confusion extends to forecasts. Consider two respected projections for 2030:
| Source | Projection | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|
| McKinsey (2024) | $2-4 trillion | Liquid markets move on-chain |
| BCG (2022) | $16-68 trillion | Illiquid assets become tradeable |
McKinsey measures what's likely given current friction. BCG measures what's possible if tokenization unlocks illiquid wealth. Both are defensible—they're answering different questions.
What This Means for Your Analysis
If you're an allocator: Focus on distributed value ($20B) for liquid exposure, but recognize institutional adoption via private chains is far larger.
If you're a strategist: The $36B total RWA figure is your baseline; the $302B stablecoin market proves tokenization already works at scale.
If you're presenting to a board: Lead with the $36B total, acknowledge the $338B with stablecoins, and note that private institutional chains process trillions monthly—this isn't speculative anymore.
The tokenized asset market isn't confusing because the data is bad. It's confusing because the market has layers—and most analysis only shows you one of them.
Build Your Team's Expertise
GSC Institute provides CE-accredited courses on institutional tokenization fundamentals and market sizing methodologies.
Explore GSC Institute